Thursday, October 20, 2005

Nailing All The Bush Criminals and Conspirators
(From Progress@American

Leak Scandal Goes To The Top
What did the President know and when did he know it?
Yesterday, the New York Daily News reported that, according to a "presidential counselor," an "angry President Bush rebuked chief political guru Karl Rove two years ago for his role in the Valerie Plame affair." According to the article, the run-in occurred "shortly after the Justice Department informed the White House in September 2003 that a criminal investigation had been launched." If the report is true, it raises serious questions about the integrity of President Bush's statements about the investigation. (At yesterday's press conference, White House spokesman Scott McClellan refused to dispute the specifics of the article.) The report also suggests that testimony provided to the special prosecutor by Bush and Rove may have been inaccurate.

Josh Marshall notes that on October 7, 2003 -- around the same time as Bush's alleged rebuke of Rove -- Bush said, "I mean this town is a -- is a town full of people who like to leak information. And I don't know if we're going to find out the senior administration official." Bush added, "[T]his is a large administration, and there's a lot of senior officials. I don't have any idea. I'd like to. I want to know the truth." The New York Daily News article suggests that Bush already knew the truth: one of the leakers was Karl Rove.

National Journal investigative reporter Murray Waas reported on 10/7/05, "In his own interview with prosecutors on June 24, 2004, Bush also testified that Rove assured him he had not disclosed Plame as a CIA employee and had said nothing to the press to discredit Wilson." Apparently, Rove has been telling a similar story. The AP reported that "Rove told President Bush and others that he never engaged in an effort to disclose a CIA operative's identity to discredit her husband's criticism of the administration's Iraq policy, according to people with knowledge of Rove's account in the probe." These accounts, if true, are completely inconsistent with the facts reported in yesterday's New York Daily News. Although Bush was not under oath, making false statements to a federal agent is still against the law.

Today, the AP reports that "Rove and I. Lewis 'Scooter' Libby discussed their contacts with reporters about an undercover CIA officer in the days before her identity was published." The conversations are "the first known intersection between two central figures in the criminal leak investigation." According to people familiar with Rove's testimony, "Rove told grand jurors it was possible he first heard in the White House that Valerie Plame, wife of Bush administration Joseph Wilson, worked for the CIA from Libby's recounting of a conversation with a journalist." (Rove has also testified that "he probably first heard of Wilson's wife in a casual social setting outside the White House in the spring of 2003 but could not remember who provided the information.") The coordination between Rove and Libby lends credence to the report that "Fitzgerald may be edging closer to a blockbuster conspiracy charge."

God Bless Patrick Fitzgerald, for doing his job without letting his political affiliation interfere with his respect for true, American justice.


Lulu Maude said...

Was there a conspiracy?

I believe that's spelled with a capital DUH.

Karen Zipdrive said...

Yeah, DUH as in Duhbya!!

JimBob said...

Convict him of treason and let the punishment be carried out in Texas.

Poetic Cowboy Justic.

Karen Zipdrive said...

I wonder, if Bush gets convicted of treason or obstruction of justice or perjury and ends up having to serve time, will we taxpayers get stuck with the bill for having to provide him with a lifetime of Secret Service protection?

Wouldn't THAT be the biggest irony known to man?

CLD said...

I think it would strip him of any of those privleges. Especially if it's treason he's convicted of. Then, he basically loses his citizenship as well.

Karen Zipdrive said...

Treason can carry a penalty of death.
Though I don't think outing Valerie Plame rises to that level of treason, I think Bush & his co-criminals are guilty of war crimes- which does rise to that level.
Ask Saddam Hussein- he too ordered the murder of innocent civilians.
Could I support a death sentence for Bush?
Well, God knows he sentenced more convicts to death than any governor in recent history, but I am not that cold.
Life in prison would suit me fine.
And I mean it- I think he is a war criminal who deserves to be convicted of it.

dusty said...

Ms.Plame's husband spoke in my humble rightwing burg tonight..his delivery was lowkey and people listened. This says volumes about what Bush did and the public is finally figuring it out..It was an overflow crowd..this in a farming community filled with rednecks and right wing repubs..

Karen Zipdrive said...

I agree. Former Ambassador Joe Wilson is very articulate and speaks without vitriol even when he's describing the smear job these GOP criminals perpetrated against him and his wife.
And having visited your humble burg before, I agree that he faced a tough audience in a right-wing stronghold.
In this male-dominated society, it is considered very cowardly to attack a man's wife out of vengeance toward him, but the Bush GOP stop at nothing to get revenge. Nothing is off limits.
I am glad to hear he's touring and enlightening Americans of all political bents.
The people need to hear the truth, and Wilson's delivery is calm, sincere and entirely credible.
I hope the Wilsons sue the living shit out of these criminals once they are run through the criminal courts.
Can you imagine Bush on the witness stand facing a sharp plaintiff's attorney peppering him with open ended questions?

dusty said...

He did mention the "S" word :)

Karen Zipdrive said...

Which S word?
Spy? Suit? Shitheels? Stupid?